Building Effective Classroom Discussions

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning

INCLUSIVE TEACHING PRACTICES

Main Links

Teaching & Learning Resources

BUILDING EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM DISCUSSIONS

Building Effective Classroom Discussions

It is critical to prepare for your discussion if you are covering content that will spark classroom discussion, especially around controversial topics. Preparing and setting up the stage for the discussion will allow for a structured exploration of the content, ensuring the learning objectives are met. Additionally, it is important to be prepared to navigate difficult discussions in class, which happen spontaneously, regardless of the content covered in class. Being prepared for spontaneous discussions will enable you to seize teachable moments, address students’ immediate interests and concerns, and foster a more engaging and responsive classroom atmosphere.

Group Discussions

Managing class discussions effectively begins by establishing ground rules for respectful communication and active listening. Encourage diverse perspectives by inviting quieter students to share their thoughts and ensuring no single voice dominates the conversation. Use open-ended questions to stimulate critical thinking and focus the discussion on the topic. Be prepared to gently steer the conversation back on track if it veers off course. Additionally, provide context and background information to ensure all students have a common understanding of the subject.

Expand all

Group Discussions How-To's

Ground Rules for Discussions
1. Set Clear Objectives: Clearly state the purpose of the discussion and what you hope students will gain from the conversation.
2. Establish Ground Rules: Emphasize the importance of respecting all viewpoints, focus on criticizing ideas, not individuals, and ensure everyone has the opportunity to speak.
3. Provide a Common Basis for Understanding: Provide students with relevant background information or readings before the discussion.
4. Facilitate Actively: Keep the conversation focused and on track, and ask open-ended questions that promote critical thinking.
5. Include Everyone: Encourage students to share and respect diverse perspectives and highlight the value of hearing different viewpoints.
6. Summarize and Reflect: Summarize the main points and any conclusions reached and encourage students to reflect on what they learned and how their perspectives may have changed.
Open-Ended Questions for Critical Thinking

To write open-ended questions that spark discussions and encourage critical thinking, focus on questions that cannot be answered with a simple “yes” or “no.” Instead, frame questions that require explanation, analysis, or evaluation. Use prompts like:

“How,” “Why,” and “What if”

to encourage deeper exploration of the topic.

For example, instead of asking, “Do you agree with this policy?” you might ask, “How might this policy impact different groups in society?” or “What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of this policy?” These types of questions invite students to think critically, consider multiple perspectives, and engage in meaningful dialogue.
Gently Steer the Conversation
You can gently steer the conversation back on track by acknowledging the current discussion and validating the students’ contributions. Then, use a transitional phrase to redirect focus, such as:
- “These are great points, but let’s bring it back to our main topic,”
- “I appreciate your insights; now let’s connect this back to our original question.”
Similarly, posing a targeted question related to the main topic can help refocus the discussion. For example, you can ask:
- “How can we use the evidence presented in this class to support this claim?”
- “How can we connect with information to [today's learning goals]”
This approach maintains a respectful and inclusive atmosphere while ensuring the conversation remains productive and relevant.
Providing Context and Background Information for Discussions

Providing context and background information sources allows you to frame the goals and focus of the discussions. These sources include academic journals, reputable news outlets, books by experts in the field, and educational websites. To find these sources, you can use academic databases like JSTOR or Google Scholar, visit your institution’s library, or consult trusted online resources such as government websites and established educational organizations.

Controversial Discussions

To effectively plan for controversial discussions in class, start by creating guidelines with your students to ensure everyone understands and agrees on respectful communication. Identify potential triggers that might arise during the discussion and establish a clear course of action to address them if they occur. Consider designing assignments that help mitigate expected conflicts by encouraging thoughtful preparation and reflection. Assign pre-discussion questions and provide references to help guide students’ thinking.

As an instructor, it is important to develop guidelines for identifying student distress and taking action to mitigate stressful climate. Controversial topics will always cause students a certain level of distress. As a result, it is important for the instructor to develop a plan to identify and address potential scenarios that might jeopardize a positive learning environment.

Expand all

Controversial Discussions How-To's

Discussion Guidelines for Students
Respectful Communication:
- Speak respectfully: Use polite language and tone, avoid interrupting others, and listen actively.
- Critique ideas, not individuals: Focus on discussing the content of ideas rather than making personal comments about the speaker.
Inclusive Participation:
- Encourage diverse perspectives: Give individuals uninterrupted time to share their ideas.
- Avoid assumptions: Do not make assumptions about others’ beliefs, experiences, or backgrounds. Approach each discussion with an open mind.
Constructive Engagement:
- Stay on topic: Avoid tangents and irrelevant comments.
- Seek understanding: Aim to understand different perspectives rather than simply arguing your own.
Identifying Potential Student Distress Triggers
Here are some physical and behavioral patterns that faculty could observe in the classroom, indicating that students might be uncomfortable and that a break might be necessary:
1. Physical Signs:
  1. Tense Body Language: Students may sit rigidly, cross their arms, or avoid eye contact.
  2. Fidgeting: Excessive movement, tapping, or playing with objects can signal discomfort.
  3. Flushed Face or Sweating: Physical signs of stress or anxiety.
  4. Avoidance: Students may physically distance themselves from others or the instructor.
2. Behavioral Indicators:
  1. Silence: Unwillingness to participate or contribute to discussions.
  2. Minimal Interaction: Lack of engagement with peers or the instructor.
  3. Nervous Habits: Nail-biting, hair-twirling, or throat-clearing.
  4. Defensive Responses: Becoming defensive or argumentative.
  5. Increased Restroom Breaks: Escaping the classroom temporarily.
3. Emotional Clues:
  1. Visible Distress: Tears, trembling, or signs of emotional overwhelm.
  2. Change in Tone: Sudden shifts in voice tone (e.g., becoming quieter).
  3. Withdrawal: Students may mentally disengage or shut down.
4. Social Dynamics:
  1. Isolation: Sitting alone or avoiding group activities.
  2. Peer Reactions: Negative responses from classmates (e.g., eye-rolling).
  3. Uneasy Interactions: Awkwardness during partner work or team projects.
Remember to be attentive to these cues and consider taking a break or adjusting the conversation to create a more supportive student environment.
Designing Assignments to Mitigate Conflict
Strategies for designing assignments that promote educational and inclusive discussions while mitigating potential controversies:
1. Clear Learning Objectives: Clearly define the purpose of the assignment. What specific skills or knowledge should students gain?
2. Structured Prompts: Craft prompts that guide students toward constructive discussions. For example, instead of an open-ended question like “Discuss abortion,” use a more focused prompt like “Analyze the historical, legal, and ethical perspectives on abortion.”
3. Balanced Readings/Resources: Provide a mix of diverse viewpoints in assigned readings or resources. Consider including materials that represent different cultural, social, and ideological backgrounds.
4. Ground Rules and Norms: Emphasize active listening, empathy, and avoiding personal attacks, and remind students that disagreement is natural, but respectful discourse is essential.
5. Structured Debates or Role-Playing: Assign debates where students argue different sides of an issue. Consider role-playing to allow students to step into others’ shoes and understand varying viewpoints.
6. Collaborative Projects: Assign group projects that require cooperation and shared decision-making. Encourage them to find common ground.
7. Alternative Formats: Allow students to express their understanding through various formats (e.g., essays, videos, infographics).
8. Reflective Assignments: Ask students to reflect on their own biases, assumptions, and growth. Focus on self-awareness and metacognition. For example, focus on “How have their perspectives evolved during the course?”
Creating Pre-Discussion Questions
Pre-lecture prompts to engage with controversial topics while maintaining a respectful and educational environment:
1. Relevance and Background:
  1. “How does this topic relate to our course content?”
  2. “What prior knowledge or experiences do you have related to this issue?”
2. Personal Reflection:
  1. “What are your initial thoughts or feelings about this topic?”
  2. “Have you encountered similar situations in your life?”
3. Open-Mindedness:
  1. “Are you willing to consider different viewpoints?”
  2. “How can we approach this topic with empathy?”
4. Critical Thinking:
  1. “What evidence or data might inform our discussion?”
  2. “What assumptions should we question?”
5. Respectful Dialogue:
  1. “How can we maintain a respectful tone during discussions?”
  2. “What ground rules should we follow to ensure everyone feels heard?”
Identifying Student Distress
1. Behavioral Changes: withdrawal from participation, increased agitation, or visible signs of anxiety.
2. Emotional Indicators: tearfulness, expressions of frustration, avoiding eye contact, or visible discomfort during discussions.
3. Physical Signs: fidgeting, shaking, changes in posture, or signs of fatigue or stress.
Strategies to Mitigate Distress
1. Create a Safe Space:encourage open communication and reassure students that their emotions are valid.
2. Provide Support Resources: Inform students about available support services, such as counseling centers or mental health resources on campus.
3. Facilitate Breaks: Allow for short breaks during intense discussions and allow students to step out if they need a moment.
4. Follow Up: Provide opportunities to debrief or discuss in private about their experience.

References:

Participation in Higher Education Classroom Discussions: How Students' Idenitities Influence Perspective Taking and Engagement:EJ1402266.pdf (ed.gov)